- HOW TO UPDATE BOEING 777 WORLDLINER PROFESSIONAL X PLANE MAC
- HOW TO UPDATE BOEING 777 WORLDLINER PROFESSIONAL X PLANE WINDOWS
When getting out of the normal flight envelope, it's up to the programmer to supply additional information.for the sake of realism. Had no trouble at all, including times I used the same iMac to surf the net for hours while XP did its thing in the background.In my book, as a long time real life GA flyer.I don't see any real advantages between look up tables and other methods, such as blade element. I've left iMac and XP9 running for 2.5 days straight, had the 747 set to fly around the world with unlimited fuel just to see if it could be done. I honestly cannot recall ever completing a flight with MSFS longer than 3 or 4 hours without trouble of some kind. It's a terrible feeling to set your FS up for a long haul flight for an over night trip say from LAX to London, only to awake to a CTD or BSOD.
HOW TO UPDATE BOEING 777 WORLDLINER PROFESSIONAL X PLANE MAC
The only sim I've never had trouble with was XP, then only on Mac OS.
HOW TO UPDATE BOEING 777 WORLDLINER PROFESSIONAL X PLANE WINDOWS
I've used every windows platform since Win95, across more than 10 computers, many were custom built for FS.Īll of them were buggy, never worked properly and CTD daily. I've been simming since the days of SubLogic.
Speak for yourself! My FSX setup has been rock solid since installation in 2006. At the same time, I'm excited for the future of XP. The recent release of Steve's DX10 fixer has given my FSX a life extension, and with the NGX and the 777, I have a few years of flying left. My usage tends to be 75% FSX and 25% XP10. I think FF will continue to update their product too. But keep in mind that PMDG has been around much longer. I do love the WX radar on FF and the fact that XP's weather engine does require you to go around storms, unless you want to lose your aircraft. I wish FF's 777 would have the real wing flex and more gradual step climbs. In short, I think PMDG beats FF in systems realism and exterior model. However, XP10 is a modern game that takes advantage of today's computers, and I love how smoothly it runs. I also own both, and I think PMDG has a clear advantage overall. RSR and Austin are constantly in communication, if you remember RSR's speech at a recent convention. It's post like these that make me want to know right now what product PMDG will reproduce for XP10. but i assume we are moving a bit "Off topic" here now! Having PMDG on a 64bit platform such as X-Plane would make me join X-Plane right away.įor now i am still "on hold" but sure and just as You have described it, certainly ". I am sure the X-Plane 777 is a great aircraft, however as long as people are asking about should they or shouldn't buy it, tells me that there is market share for PMDG to grow and expand their market share in the X-Plane platform.Īnd If and when they do other developers will follow, and I am sure the lack of AI and other things that are in X-Plane that need developed or improved will happen rather quickly. I have enjoyed MS for a long time, I and will continue in the future, but knowing what a 64bit operating system can do for gaming applications makes me hope that it comes sooner than later.
I will have to admit when PMDG starts creating aircraft for X-plane, I will hit the buy button. After reading this post and several others about X-plane, If I were Laminar Research, I would be catering to Robert at PMDG, it sounds like their are many people like myself that on the fence about jumping to X-Plane.
0 kommentar(er)
